YR Bajad Associates

Delhi HC Upholds Validity Of The Provision Which Prohibits Prisoners From Voting In Elections - Delhi High Court has refused to declare section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, which prohibits prisoners from voting in elections, as unconstitutional. While upholding the validity of the said provision, the Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Hari Shankar has held that the classification of the persons who are in jail and who are out of jail is a valid classification and it has a reasonable nexus with the objects sought to be achieved by the Act. The present plea of Public Interest Litigation was filed by one of the prisoners, challenging the constitutional validity of section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act. The said provision reads as: 'No person shall vote at any election if he is confined in a prison, whether under a sentence of imprisonment or transportation or otherwise, or is in the lawful custody of the police.' Th...

The death penalty of the criminals adjourned The court today conceded the execution of convicts in the Nirbhaya assault case. The execution was planned to happen on March 3 at 6am. The decision comes after a seat of judges N V Ramana, Arun Mishra, R F Nariman, R Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan said that no case is made out for rethinking the conviction and the discipline of the convict. Court has conceded the issue as the kindness request of one of the convicts, Pawan is pending before the President of India. The Union Home Ministry got the leniency appeal of Pawan Gupta, one of the four death row convicts, authorities said on Monday. The service will send the request to President Ram Nath Kovind for his thought and decision. The Supreme Court dismissed his remedial request before that day. Gupta had documented the request last Friday, looking for the changing of his capital punishment to life detainment. A five-judge seat headed by Justice N V Ramana, which thought ab...

The Modi government's decision list in the Supreme Court of 2020 Other important decisions taken by the Central Government, including the removal of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), Article 370 in the year 2019, will have to pass the Supreme Court Calitamus Test in the year 2020. These are some of the issues which had been on the BJP's agenda since the beginning and these issues have been raged in the ruling party and opposition parties. The decision of the Supreme Court on the 2019 Rafael deal was a big relief to the central government as the issue was loudly raised by the opposition parties in the Lok Sabha elections and the ruling party was accused of corruption. The year 2019 will also be remembered for the Ayodhya case. This dispute, which has been going on for many decades, was settled by the Supreme Court. This issue was also seen by connecting with the government in power at the Center. The New Year, which started after a severe cold, may get 'political ...

498A मामले पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा संशोधित निर्देश 498A Modified instructions by Supreme Court कई सालों से, सुप्रीम कोर्ट IPC 498a के दुरुपयोग पर निर्णय दे रहा है और उन्होंने कानून मंत्रालय से इस पर विचार करने के लिए कहा था। कई राज्यों में 498 ए के तहत गिरफ्तारी से पहले जांच करने या डीसीपी जैसी उच्च पुलिस की अनुमति लेने के लिए पहले से ही पुलिस परिपत्र हैं, लेकिन इन नियमों का पालन करने की कोई गारंटी नहीं है। न्यायमूर्ति चंद्रमौली क्र प्रसाद ने जस्टिस पिनाकी चंद्र घोष के साथ मिलकर अपना फैसला सुनाया। हाल के वर्षों में विभिन्न वैवाहिक मामले सामने आए। IPC की धारा 498-A का मुख्य उद्देश्य अपने पति और रिश्तेदारों के हाथों महिलाओं के उत्पीड़न के खिलाफ एक ढाल के रूप में कार्य करना है। तथ्य यह है कि धारा 498-ए एक संज्ञेय और गैर-जमानती अपराध है, कई अपमानजनक और धूर्त पत्नियां ढाल के बजाय इस खंड को एक हथियार के रूप में उपयोग करती हैं। ऐसे मामले हैं जहां पति के पुराने दादा दादी को सलाखों के पीछे डाल दिया गया था। पत्नियों द्वारा ससुराल के परिवार को परेशान करने का सबसे सरल तरीका इस प्रावधान को एक ...